Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with ESMTP id SAA14349 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 18:34:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA040465652; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 15:34:12 -0700
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 15:34:12 -0700
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <9604101719.AA00fhj@meta.burner.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: jkrutz@meta.burner.com (Jamie Krutz) ()
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: NT ram disk
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
In article <199604062341.SAA04023@norden1.com> Tim Krego <tkrego@norden1.com> writes:
> At 03:03 PM 4/6/96 -0500, you wrote:
> Please, no Amiga vs. NT arguments.
But that's just what you posted. Sheesh, Tim.
It's possible to like NT and still notice things it could do better, particularly
when those things already exist on other machines people are using, like